Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?

Am 02.03.2011 um 23:01 schrieb Lars Heuer:

> [...]
>> instances of a topic type. I can hardly imagine a use case case for
>> indirect but who knows.
> 
> Maybe TMRM and a possible mapping to TMDM ruined my way of thinking,
> but if I'd ask for tmdm:subject I'd expect that I get everything which
> is an (indirect) instance of tmdm:subject (occurrences, associations,
> names, topics).

tmdm:subject is not abstract. I typed a topic as just being a subject once, because i had no clue what it was. Except for something that can be talked about. But i agree that a use case might come up one day.

Robert