Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:30:42PM +0100, Lars Heuer wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> [...]
> > It should even be possible to implement a TMAPI implementation on top
> > of TMQL (for whoever wants that (-; )
> 
> Implementing TMAPI on top of TMQL is definitely no goal for TMQL.

It was implied, though, but never expressed explicitly. Most TMAPI
people would have gone postal when they had read it.

Maybe this is also the main reason that TMQLish thinking never made it
into the mainstream: people simply prefer this kind of TMAPI thinking
where you do ONE thing and then store it away. Then you do another
thing, and store it away. Best in reverse order of construction[1].

\rho

[1] http://kill.devc.at/system/files/javaposter58320973.jpg