TMQL - new draft - comments

Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,


Comments against <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1586rev.pdf>

I didn't read it in detail, but the syntax for item identifiers and
subject identifiers is identical which may lead to surprising results
(slide 59, 60).

I am a bit surprised that user-defined functions are back. Further,
functions like "some" etc are also back. These things have been
dropped a few iteration ago. What's the rational for the mind-shift?

Best regards,
Lars

PS: I tend to join the "tolog for TMQL" group *just* to have *some*
standardized query language.

-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com/>

<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.