TMQL - new draft - comments
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Comments against <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1586rev.pdf> I didn't read it in detail, but the syntax for item identifiers and subject identifiers is identical which may lead to surprising results (slide 59, 60). I am a bit surprised that user-defined functions are back. Further, functions like "some" etc are also back. These things have been dropped a few iteration ago. What's the rational for the mind-shift? Best regards, Lars PS: I tend to join the "tolog for TMQL" group *just* to have *some* standardized query language. -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com/> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine