Re: tolog for TMQL

[...]
> again that Groundhog Dog feeling.

:) ... Day :)

Since the current path seems to ignore the (IMO) good model of Barta's
query language and starts from zero (again), what do we have to loose
if we take standardize a modified tolog as level-0 and introduce the
path language later? The current proposal seems have not a good model
as Barta's model. It provides no advanced model compared to tolog but
introduces just a new syntax and introduces something new and lacks of
a proof that it works.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia
<http://www.semagia.com/>