Re: Latest on TMQL?

Dear Lars,

To say the truth, I am not sure any more. Some work has been done as you 
might notice from the slides that were sent around. In the meeting in 
Prague I had the impression that we are not far from closing all the 
loose ends. I truly believed that we will have it done by now.

However, later it turned out that we did not fully understand each 
other, and a main disagreement was uncovered (practically, Benjamin 
thinks that the path expression we developed should be *added* to the 
current draft, while I believe it should *replace* the path expression 
of the current draft).

Since Benjamin is unavailable in the current months, I am not sure how 
to proceed - an implementation of the suggested TMQL is not available 
(although we have most of the path expression implemented in house), and 
although the ideas are clear to me, they are not yet written in the 
draft standard.

Any suggestions, opinions are welcomed.

Kind regards,

Rani

On 15-Jun-2011 18:06, Lars Heuer wrote:
> [...]
>>> Was wondering if there was any further updates to the current TMQL
>>> thinking/draft specification beyond what was tossed around in March.
>
>
>> ... maybe we should start to implement tolog ... ;)
>
> Seriously: This question hangs around for almost two weeks.
>
> Rani/Benjamin, are you still working on TMQL or is this project dead?
>
> Best regards,
> Lars

-- 
Rani Pinchuk
Project Manager
Space Applications Services
Leuvensesteenweg, 325
B-1932 Zaventem
Belgium

Tel.: + 32 2 721 54 84
Fax.: + 32 2 721 54 44

http://www.spaceapplications.com