Re: Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships

[...]
> That TMRM tries to follow the "intuitive" meaning (whatever that is)
> of subclassing and instantiation? That E should be an instance of C
> is in no way intuitive to me. Do you have a real-life example?

NB: The TMRM-TMDM mapping is wrong then. The mapping does not cover
TMDM's interpretation of supertype-subtype and type-instance
relationships since the TMRM-TMDM mapping seems to rely on the TMRM
definition of isa/sub.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine