Re: Fwd: Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:56:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Quitnin, [...] > Making x isa x forbidden would cause me great headaches because it > would break my schema ontology to validate itself. This leads me to > another question: > Does TMCL not specify: > "tmcl:topic-type isa tmcl:topic-type" > ? It does. And if TMCL has a TMQL/TMRM foundation, I wonder if section 5. b) of TMRM shouldn't be relaxed. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine