Re: Fwd: Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Robert Barta <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:20:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 09:23:23PM +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> I tried raising this with Robert on sc34wg3 a couple of years ago
> but was never able to start a meaningful discussion. Anyway, like
> the other Lars I believe the TMRM restriction should be relaxed.
I cannot remember that this was an issue before. But my memories of
TMs are quickly fading anyway.
While a statement
something isa something
makes me cringe (except in some very metaphysic situations) because of
its obvious meaninglessness, there is no *direct* technical reason
against relaxing this - from a TMRM perspective.
Logicians may think otherwise, but logic is certainly overrated.
\rho