Re: One quibble re: topicmap
Alexander Johannesen <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:36:28 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF89bCBOpcofWod2aTXmYMjD1snXFySZ41-snZVCWAndaJkGEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hiya, Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> wrote: > My goal was to get a discussion going about those pieces in general, even if > we don't agree all the pieces or where they go. We're still waiting for people to wake up, I think. :) > Or quite honestly, to use good ideas you have for explaining modeling to > users for my own. ;-) You mean this? ; https://plus.google.com/u/0/111886865967199209050/posts/QLx3LLeseeD I have to admit that since doing Topic Maps, the world has for me become a very different place, and my understanding of the underlying problems that most software developers struggle with usually come from places that aren't normally blamed. There really should be an uprising, but ... well. Coffee. > I may have a logic contest some time soon to see how many people use various > forms of logic in the average day. Suspect the numbers are going to be really low. I take it you mean formal logic? Because if not, the numbers will be even lower than you suspect, given the wife, and the kids and the neighbours and my boss and "other people" and ... :) Regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---