Re: Semantic Business Intelligence
Wouter Beek <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:07:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.semantic-web,gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE1un7NJtLLZgm+5JXFXsVbCdyXrdYW5dKFk1nnNuC5=bW4umw@mail.gmail.com> |
--001a1134926600cb6d05197a8402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E2=80=8BDear Sebastian,=E2=80=8B On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]> wrote: > 'arithmetic' inference =E2=80=8BI'm not sure what this is. In your PDF document you state that: "If a set of Subjects share the same set of Predicates the resulting set could be regarded as an 'inferred' same type."=E2=80=8B This definition of "same type" is flawed since according to it `ex:a` in [1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have the same type: [1] ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple . [2] ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear . Would it not be more accurate to describe what you want to do as _classification_? --- Best regards!, Wouter Beek. E-mail: [email protected] WWW: www.wouterbeek.com Tel.: 0647674624 --001a1134926600cb6d05197a8402 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_default" st= yle=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">=E2=80=8BDear Sebastian,=E2=80=8B<b= r><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Seb= astian Samaruga <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]= m" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockqu= ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px= solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">'arithmetic' inference</b= lockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace= ,monospace">=E2=80=8BI'm not sure what this is.<br><br></div><div class= =3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">In your PDF do= cument you state that: "If a set of Subjects share the same set of Pre= dicates the resulting set <br>could be regarded as an 'inferred' sa= me type."=E2=80=8B<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"= font-family:monospace,monospace">This definition of "same type" i= s flawed since according to it `ex:a` in [1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have t= he same type:<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-famil= y:monospace,monospace">[1]=C2=A0=C2=A0 ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple .<br></div><d= iv class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">[2]=C2= =A0=C2=A0 ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear=C2=A0 .<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_defaul= t" style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_= default" style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">Would it not be more acc= urate to describe what you want to do as _classification_?<br></div><span s= tyle=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace"><br clear=3D"all"></span><div><div= class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-family:mono= space,monospace">---<br></span><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"displa= y:inline"><span style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">Best regards!,<br= ></span></div><span style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">Wouter Beek.<= br><br>E-mail: <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">w.g.j.= [email protected]</a><br>WWW: <a href=3D"http://www.wouterbeek.com" target=3D"_bla= nk">www.wouterbeek.com</a><br>Tel.: 0647674624</span></div></div></div> </div></div> --001a1134926600cb6d05197a8402--