Re: Semantic Business Intelligence
Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:20:37 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.semantic-web,gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFnmbpUJfgxY6_3dOm=nDfdAwKqdHvhiLx0bOptWs+U6DtJN4w@mail.gmail.com> |
--20cf303ddb1a5c2f42051984c020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wouter, I welcome your observations. What I've stated and maybe is not well understood is that the triples I'm willing to process have no schema information at all, not even rdf:type. So, if many subjects has properties 'brand', 'price' and 'discount' I 'classificate' them as Products. And if the new 'type' has an ID and I use it to update the IDs of the subjects in a given statement I can regard a subject of being of a 'type' because its ID is a product of the ''type' predicate IDs. Best regards, Sebastian. On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Wouter Beek <[email protected]> wrote: > =E2=80=8BDear Sebastian,=E2=80=8B > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]= > > wrote: > >> 'arithmetic' inference > > =E2=80=8BI'm not sure what this is. > > In your PDF document you state that: "If a set of Subjects share the same > set of Predicates the resulting set > could be regarded as an 'inferred' same type."=E2=80=8B > > This definition of "same type" is flawed since according to it `ex:a` in > [1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have the same type: > > [1] ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple . > [2] ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear . > > Would it not be more accurate to describe what you want to do as > _classification_? > > --- > Best regards!, > Wouter Beek. > > E-mail: [email protected] > WWW: www.wouterbeek.com > Tel.: 0647674624 > --20cf303ddb1a5c2f42051984c020 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>Wouter,<br><br></div>I welcome your observa= tions. What I've stated and maybe is not well understood is that the tr= iples I'm willing to process have no schema information at all, not eve= n rdf:type. So, if many subjects has properties 'brand', 'price= ' and 'discount' I 'classificate' them as Products. And= if the new 'type' has an ID and I use it to update the IDs of the = subjects in a given statement I can regard a subject of being of a 'typ= e' because its ID is a product of the ''type' predicate IDs= ..<br><br></div>Best regards,<br></div>Sebastian.<br><br><div><div><div clas= s=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:= 07 AM, Wouter Beek <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]= " target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote c= lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;= padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div style=3D= "font-family:monospace,monospace">=E2=80=8BDear Sebastian,=E2=80=8B<br><br>= </div><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian= Samaruga <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" tar= get=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl= ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid= rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">'arithmetic' inference</blockqu= ote></div><div style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">=E2=80=8BI'm n= ot sure what this is.<br><br></div><div style=3D"font-family:monospace,mono= space">In your PDF document you state that: "If a set of Subjects shar= e the same set of Predicates the resulting set <br>could be regarded as an = 'inferred' same type."=E2=80=8B<br><br></div><div style=3D"fon= t-family:monospace,monospace">This definition of "same type" is f= lawed since according to it `ex:a` in [1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have the = same type:<br><br></div><div style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">[1]= =C2=A0=C2=A0 ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple .<br></div><div style=3D"font-family:mo= nospace,monospace">[2]=C2=A0=C2=A0 ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear=C2=A0 .<br></div><= div style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace"><br></div><div style=3D"font-= family:monospace,monospace">Would it not be more accurate to describe what = you want to do as _classification_?<br></div><span style=3D"font-family:mon= ospace,monospace"><br clear=3D"all"></span><div><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span= style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">---<br></span><div style=3D"disp= lay:inline"><span style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">Best regards!,<= br></span></div><span style=3D"font-family:monospace,monospace">Wouter Beek= ..<br><br>E-mail: <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">w.g.= [email protected]</a><br>WWW: <a href=3D"http://www.wouterbeek.com" target=3D"_b= lank">www.wouterbeek.com</a><br>Tel.: 0647674624</span></div></div></div> </div></div> </blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div> --20cf303ddb1a5c2f42051984c020--