Re: Relax NG Compact Syntax and TMCL-light
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:53:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.tmcl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001101c3d59a$f9bfc3c0$7d01a8c0__36378.8136085079$1073709079@dbn> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Marius Garshol" To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:44 PM Subject: Re: [tmcl-wg] Relax NG Compact Syntax and TMCL-light > I agree. I looked at your example, but that seemed to me to simply be > an LTM-like compact syntax for OSL, with support for data typing. Was > that the intention? If so, I quite like the idea in general, but I'm > not sure OSL is what we want to base TMCL on. > > We probably do want a compact syntax, though. I did another attempt (I just firstly try to get idea about possibilities in this area): http://homepage.mac.com/dmitryv/TopicMaps/TMPath/TMCL-Lite-Compact.txt It is not a real "syntax", but an idea: easily define schema for type and later add constraints. Kind of LTM... It is also a "partial description". Two descriptions can be easily combined. BTW, why do you think that OSL is not a good start for TMCL? Dmitry