gmane.text.xml.xtm.tmcl

60 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Some inconsistencies in the tmcl schema
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:33:08 +0100
Michael Quaas <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Scope support in Ontopoly
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:56:18 +0200
Graham Moore <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Scope support in Ontopoly
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:46:15 +0200
"Steve Pepper" <[email protected]> • #66
CTM Templates and the prefix notation
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:51:19 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #65
Re: Why are datatypes not constrained?
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:34:36 +0200
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #64
Why are datatypes not constrained?
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:23:18 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #63
TMCL Comments
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:40:48 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #62
Feedback on TMCL presentation in Montreal
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:35:34 +0200
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #61
Presentation from Montreal
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:54:19 -0400
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #60
Some notes from the TMCL meeting in Amsterdam 2005
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:41:59 -0400
DmitryV <[email protected]> • #59
Re: New TMCL draft is posted on isotopicmaps web site
Mon, 9 May 2005 15:13:20 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #58
New TMCL draft is posted on isotopicmaps web site
Thu, 5 May 2005 20:40:23 -0400
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #57
TMCL Requirements and Use Cases: constraint 4.1.2.U4.(c)
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:32:47 +0100
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #56
RE: XTche
Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:30:43 -0000
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #55
XTche
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:06:16 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #54
TMCL-Grammar: experimenting with TMCL-Schema
Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:03:29 -0500
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #53
(no subject)
Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:49:23 -0500
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #52
TMCL Requirements: Constraint by basename type
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:18:54 -0000
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #51
RE: RE: New version of TMCL Requirements, use cases and specification (Dmitry)
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:02:13 +0100
<[email protected]> • #50
RE: New version of TMCL Requirements, use cases and specification (Dmitry)
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:28:02 -0000
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #49
Comments: New version of TMCL specification, 2.2
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:41:07 -0400
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #48
Re: New version of TMCL Requirements, use cases and specification
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:03:03 +0200
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #47
New version of TMCL Requirements, use cases and specification
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:14:53 -0400
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #46
TMCL Editors Update
Tue, 25 May 2004 10:54:37 +0200
[email protected] • #45
Summary of TMCL meeting in Amsterdam
Tue, 18 May 2004 19:51:28 -0400
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #44
RE: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:16:23 +0100
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #43
Amsterdam meeting of WG3 - registration required
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 14:56:23 +0200
"Steve Pepper" <[email protected]> • #42
Re: FYI: TMSchema presentation updated
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 04:44:53 -0500
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #41
Re: FYI: TMSchema presentation updated
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:30:16 -0500
Dmitry <[email protected]> • #40
Re: FYI: TMSchema presentation updated
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:40:44 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #39
FYI: TMSchema presentation updated
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:53:27 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #38
Extreme Markup Languages Conference 2004
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:17:15 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Steve Newcomb) • #37
WG3 meeting in Amsterdam
Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:47:58 +0100
"Steve Pepper" <[email protected]> • #36
Call for TMCL Proposals [Was FYI: New attempt with TMCL Lite]
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:54:53 +0900
"Mary Y. Nishikawa" <[email protected]> • #35
FYI: TMSchema presentation
Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:23:28 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #34
FYI: New attempt with TMCL Lite schemas (TM-based now)
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:57:26 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: [tmql-wg] Result set requirements
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:09:14 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #32
Re: New attempt with compact TMCL (Python-like)
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:36:39 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #31
Re: New attempt with compact TMCL (Python-like)
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:17:58 -0500
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> • #30
Re: New attempt with compact TMCL (Python-like)
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:45:16 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #29
Re: FYI: Combining RELAX NG and Schematron
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:52:36 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:32:33 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:27:09 -0000
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #26
Re: FYI: Combining RELAX NG and Schematron
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:57:39 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #25
Re: FYI: Combining RELAX NG and Schematron
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:57:13 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #24
Re: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:43:26 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #23
Re: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:35:20 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #22
Re: Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:48:47 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #21
Doubts in TMCL Requirements
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:20:52 -0000
"Giovani Librelotto" <[email protected]> • #20
Re: FYI: Combining RELAX NG and Schematron
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:47:00 +1000
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #19