Re: New version of TMCL Requirements, use cases and specification

* [email protected]
|
| and TMCL specification (first draft)
| 
| http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0549.htm

This document does not follow the ISO directives. I suppose this was
intentional?

2.2: NOTE 1: Robert Barta's AsTMa! can be used to filter topic maps so
that only the constructs that would be valid according to the schema
are included in the output. I think this is a really valuable
function, and it would be nice if TMCL could specify this as an
alternative way to apply the TMCL schema.

2.3: This I haven't understood yet. More explanation might help. Will
try again, though.

2.5: This needs to be aligned with TMQL (as you note). I propose that
you just carry on working on this as if TMQL didn't exist, and that we
do the alignment later when we are ready.

2.7: I have done a very simple "topic map schema represented in topic
maps" for a completely different purpose. I'd be happy to release this
if you are interested in seeing it. It's simple, but might be better
than nothing.

References:

  - OSL: This is actually version 1.0 of OSL. The 2.0 is referring to
    the OKS version. I admit this is confusing.

I realize this is quite slim. I'll post more once I've been able to
digest section 2.3 and friends.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >