Re: [tmql-wg] Result set requirements

From: "Lars Marius Garshol"

> * Robert Barta
> |
> | But someone could argue that you are introducing through the back
> | door a TM update language: You have a TM information item and you
> | would like to modify some aspects of it.
> |
> | I think we need that at some stage, but this is certainly nothing I
> | would do ad-hoc.
>
> Not only that, but I'm not sure I'd do it at all. I discussed this
> with Geir Ove today and we both found ourselves thinking that simply
> removing the old items and adding new ones might be cleaner and
> simpler.
>

OK... I agree that it was probably not the best time to discuss updates. :-)

I re-wrote original sample without updates...

http://homepage.mac.com/dmitryv/TopicMaps/TMPath/TologBasedSample1.htm

And ... I realized what I am missing most in Tolog: simple path expressions
for topics.

I really would like to use something like this:

person[X, webPage like  "....", age<20 | age >40],
born-in(X:who,Y:where),city[Y, name like "....."]

person[X, <simple path expressions>] - is a "shortcut", of course, which can
be expressed in real Tolog.



Dmitry