Re: Proposed requirements: Operations on primitive types

* Chris Angus
|
| It is not clear to me that TM standards are oblivious to typing
| given the existence of published subject indicators for
| "class-instance", "class" and "instance".  What XTM 1.0 does not
| include are any published subject indicators for classes that
| represent underlying data types such as "number" and "date".

That is of course true. I assumed Robert implicitly meant that the TM
standards are oblivious to *primitive* types and responded to that,
but you are of course right.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >