RE: Proposed requirements: Operations on primitive types

Lars

I guess that the reason that I brought it up was that if anything is to
be done around typed resources it would be difficult to ignore the
existence of the class-instance mechanism.  The problem, as I see it,
would be making the connection between a TM class and a specific
primitive data type - it would not seem that appropriate for a query
language to be making the necessary assertion and there are currently no
PSI's for them.

Regards
________________________________________________________________________
____

Chris Angus
Product Architect
Kalido Ltd
 
Direct:  +44 (0)20 7934 4960
Home:  +44 (0)16 9774 1504
Fax:     +44 (0)20 7934 3377
http://www.kalido.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Marius Garshol [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 22 July 2003 13:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [tmql-wg] Proposed requirements: Operations on primitive
types


* Chris Angus
|
| It is not clear to me that TM standards are oblivious to typing
| given the existence of published subject indicators for
| "class-instance", "class" and "instance".  What XTM 1.0 does not
| include are any published subject indicators for classes that
| represent underlying data types such as "number" and "date".

That is of course true. I assumed Robert implicitly meant that the TM
standards are oblivious to *primitive* types and responded to that,
but you are of course right.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >

_______________________________________________
tmql-wg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/tmql-wg