Re: Types, byte codes etc.
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1178912561.25277.108.camel@nero> |
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 09:54 -0400, Brad Baxter wrote: > Just to be sure I caught that right, you're saying that the canonical > format will replace all symbolic tags with verbatim tags? Will the > above directives be absent, then? Not that we have formally defined the canonical format... but yes, that would be my take on it. Otherwise you have an arbitrary choice of prefixes, etc. which defeat the "one way to present the data" goal. Hey, nobody said the canonical format is _pretty_ :-) Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/