Re: C implementations

"Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke-97/[email protected]>" <j.wuttke-97/[email protected]> Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:45:06 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

>> Implementations:
>>  - C:
>>    - libyaml       # YAML 1.1 library, the base for further development
>>    - Syck          # YAML 1.0 library, still used in several language 
>> bindings
>>
>> Note: for a given language, the order of implementations should be a true
>> ranking, implying recommendation of what to use.
> 
>  I'm somewhat surprised to see this.  Is libyaml actually suggested?

Not by me. I could as well live with

   - C:
     - Syck          # YAML 1.0 library, used in most language bindings
     - libyaml       # YAML 1.1 library, currently 0.0.1 though quite stable

What matters is: a clear project organisation, consense about which tools
should be used right now, and a roadmap for future development.

- Joachim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone