Re: Recommended parser for Java

On 10.12.2009, at 12:45, Andrey Somov wrote:

> Can we may be vote here? The poll is very simple.
> 
> 1) yes, I do want to indicate the recommended Java parser and it
> should be Bla-bla
> 2) no, please do not indicate the recommended parser (because bla-bla)
> 
> If we clearly see the leader then it may be shown on the yaml.org
> 
> I vote for p. 1 (Since I am biased I do not indicate which parser :)
> 
> The selection criteria may include:
> - community
> - open issues/bugs
> - specification compliance
> - features
> - documentation
> 
> Please note that I do not propose to remove or discourage anything.
> Just to select one parser for Java and mark it as recommended. Once
> another parser
> becomes better the recommendation may change.

I do not see the reason to make java special in any way.
Probably, it would be a better idea to provide comparison table for all known implementations? (grouped by language)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev