Re: Recommended parser for Java
Andrey Somov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > I do not see the reason to make java special in any way. > Probably, it would be a better idea to provide comparison table for all known implementations? (grouped by language) Then it very easily goes out of control. For instance, I know many details about all the Java parsers but I cannot add anything for Perl. If in one language there is a clear leader it does not mean the same for any other language. May be the Perl community is perfectly happy having many implementations. Anyway we can do it one-by-one. And Java can give a good start. But I would like to keep each language independent. I mean I do not see the reason to put any delay on Java if any other language is still choosing its favorite. - Andrey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev