Re: Recommended parser for Java

On 10.12.2009, at 13:52, Andrey Somov wrote:

>> 
>> I do not see the reason to make java special in any way.
>> Probably, it would be a better idea to provide comparison table for all known implementations? (grouped by language)
> 
> Then it very easily goes out of control.
> 
> For instance, I know many details about all the Java parsers but I
> cannot add anything for Perl.
> If in one language there is a clear leader it does not mean the same
> for any other language.
> May be the Perl community is perfectly happy having many implementations.
> 
> Anyway we can do it one-by-one. And Java can give a good start.
> But I would like to keep each language independent. I mean I do not
> see the  reason to put any delay on Java if any other language is
> still choosing its favorite.

I am against declaring "best" implementation.
I am for providing comparison-table. as detailed as possible.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev