Re: JSYNC 1.0 Specification
Brad Baxter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ingy dot Net <[email protected]> wrote: > I have spent much of yesterday and today putting together a JSYNC > Spec. I would be most happy if those interested would review it and > comment. I think the language is clear, and it seems to accomplish the design goal: Be a minimal extension of JSON. I look forward to a Perl implementation. :-) Out of curiosity, I'd like to see the results of these round trips: YAML1 => object => JSYNC => object => YAML2 => object JSYNC1 => object => YAML => object => JSYNC2 => object If every object is identical, it's probably moot how closely YAML1 matches YAML2 and JSYNC1 matches JSYNC2, but it'd be interesting to see. Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo