Re: JSYNC 1.0 Specification
Ingy dot Net <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Brad Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ingy dot Net <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have spent much of yesterday and today putting together a JSYNC >> Spec. I would be most happy if those interested would review it and >> comment. > > I think the language is clear, and it seems to accomplish the design > goal: Be a minimal extension of JSON. I look forward to a Perl > implementation. :-) I already started working on (and pushed out to CPAN and GitHub) a currently fairly useless Perl implementation. I hope to create equivalent Perl Python Ruby and JS impls over the next week. > Out of curiosity, I'd like to see the results of these round trips: > > YAML1 => object => JSYNC => object => YAML2 => object > > JSYNC1 => object => YAML => object => JSYNC2 => object > > If every object is identical, it's probably moot how closely YAML1 > matches YAML2 and JSYNC1 matches JSYNC2, but it'd be > interesting to see. I hope that JSYNC dev, pushes YAML dev to this obvious desired conclusion. Ingy > > Brad > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo