Re: Encoding

Thank you. 

On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 12:00 -0400, Steve Schafer wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:52:56 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> >Those two lines would seem to contradict each other. Is it that they
> >must use the same character encoding unless a BOM precedes the document?
> 
> No, they must all use the same encoding. The clause allows for the
> presence of redundant BOMs. The key point is in the next sentence in the
> spec:
> 
> "This makes it easier to concatenate streams."
> 
> In other words, you don't have to strip off otherwise redundant BOMs
> when you're concatenating documents into a single stream, and (if you're
> documents are all preceded by redundant BOMs) you don't need to insert
> additional BOMs when you're splitting documents into separate streams.
> 
> -Steve



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk