Re: Encoding
Steve Schafer <steve-bHQK/pGi2DVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fenestra Technologies |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:52:56 -0700, you wrote: >Those two lines would seem to contradict each other. Is it that they >must use the same character encoding unless a BOM precedes the document? No, they must all use the same encoding. The clause allows for the presence of redundant BOMs. The key point is in the next sentence in the spec: "This makes it easier to concatenate streams." In other words, you don't have to strip off otherwise redundant BOMs when you're concatenating documents into a single stream, and (if you're documents are all preceded by redundant BOMs) you don't need to insert additional BOMs when you're splitting documents into separate streams. -Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk