Re: YPath Specification still ongoing?
Peter Murphy <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:26:13 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANZ_uBhER+ZPD9jgNTqFb4t7=ZZiF4C6T5P6nUj0s4zVEq=3gQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Pieter, Good day. I started working on it in 2011, but I never got around to adding anything to it. Too busy with other things, I guess. So if you are interested in it: (a) Feel free to fork the spec (or write your own), and: (b) Work on an implementation of it (possibly in PyYAML or another engine). Best regards, Peter On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Pieter Heyvaert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > Is the development of the YPath specification still ongoing [1,2]? Or is > there a consensus about how to select data from a YAML document. > > In the use case that I have, I can convert the YAML file to JSON and use > JSONPath to access the data. However, it might be more generic to work > directly on YAML, considering that it is a superset of JSON. > > > [1] https://github.com/yaml/YPath-Specification > > [2] https://github.com/peterkmurphy/YPath-Specification > > > Kind regards > Pieter Heyvaert > Ghent University - imec > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Yaml-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core > -- Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.pkmurphy.com.au/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot