Re: YPath Specification still ongoing?

Peter Murphy <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:26:13 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <CANZ_uBhER+ZPD9jgNTqFb4t7=ZZiF4C6T5P6nUj0s4zVEq=3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Pieter,

Good day. I started working on it in 2011, but I never got around to
adding anything to it. Too busy with other things, I guess.

So if you are interested in it:

(a) Feel free to fork the spec (or write your own), and:

(b) Work on an implementation of it (possibly in PyYAML or another engine).

Best regards,
Peter




On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Pieter Heyvaert
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Is the development of the YPath specification still ongoing [1,2]? Or is
> there a consensus about how to select data from a YAML document.
>
> In the use case that I have, I can convert the YAML file to JSON and use
> JSONPath to access the data. However, it might be more generic to work
> directly on YAML, considering that it is a superset of JSON.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/yaml/YPath-Specification
>
> [2] https://github.com/peterkmurphy/YPath-Specification
>
>
> Kind regards
> Pieter Heyvaert
> Ghent University - imec
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Yaml-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
>



-- 
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.pkmurphy.com.au/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot