Re: YPath Specification still ongoing?
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:54:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 12:26, Peter Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pieter, > > Good day. I started working on it in 2011, but I never got around to > adding anything to it. Too busy with other things, I guess. > > So if you are interested in it: > > (a) Feel free to fork the spec (or write your own), and: > > (b) Work on an implementation of it (possibly in PyYAML or another engine). Hmm. Should Ypath be cognizant of (i.e., dependent on) the serialization or really operate at the data model level? (If equivalent YAML is to stay really equivalent, it needs to be the latter.) In that case, the actual YAML engine isn’t that relevant to a YPath implementation... Grüße, Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Yaml-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core