Re: Perl vs Java - your feedback, not flames
Sandip Bhattacharya <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:16:01 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (http://www.puroga.com) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kapoor, Nishikant wrote: > but mention Perl once and the first comment is "It is good for fast > prototyping but probably, not good enough for full-scale development". > What do you think? Why does the burden of proof lie on Perl? I > will be looking for some large projects in Perl (and Java) right > after I am done writing this email, but if something comes to mind, > please feel free to mention it. I believe the real question is not about suitability of Perl, but about suitability of scripting languages in general. If scripting languages are proven good enough for enterprise-scale applications, then Perl will automatically qualify. If the question is rephrased therefore, examples are many: Google uses Python extensively for large parts of their site. So does NASA, and Yahoo, and many more. Whatever be the technical/philosophical/emotional merits of PHP/Python or any other scripting languages, it is an undisputed fact that Perl has the largest breadth of proven third party library support. This is a critical criteria of many projects. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya * Puroga Technologies * sandip-/[email protected] Work: http://www.puroga.com * Home: http://www.sandipb.net PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3