Re: Perl vs Java - your feedback, not flames

Sandip Bhattacharya <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:16:01 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi.devel
Organization Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (http://www.puroga.com)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Kapoor, Nishikant wrote:
> but mention Perl once and the first comment is "It is good for fast 
 > prototyping but probably, not good enough for full-scale development".
 > What do you think? Why does the burden of proof lie on Perl? I
> will be looking for some large projects in Perl (and Java) right 
> after I am done writing this email, but if something comes to mind, 
> please feel free to mention it.

I believe the real question is not about suitability of Perl, but about 
suitability of scripting languages in general. If scripting languages are 
proven good enough for enterprise-scale applications, then Perl will 
automatically qualify.

If the question is rephrased therefore, examples are many:
Google uses Python extensively for large parts of their site. So does NASA, 
and Yahoo, and many more.

Whatever be the technical/philosophical/emotional merits of PHP/Python or 
any other scripting languages, it is an undisputed fact that Perl has the 
largest breadth of proven third party library support. This is a critical 
criteria of many projects.

- Sandip

-- 
Sandip Bhattacharya    *    Puroga Technologies   *     sandip-/[email protected]
Work: http://www.puroga.com        *         Home: http://www.sandipb.net

PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3