Re: [dylug] Networking question
NITIN chandnani <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.dylug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi i dont think u can spoof mac addresses u can only spoof IP addresses... u wanna do some ressearch on it before moving ahead with your ideas ;) nitin --- abhijit deodhar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Thanks for the replies. > > One more question. > As pointed by Amit Gud, we can spoof MAC addresses. > So in that case can we have a single NIC with 2 > addresses (one original and other spoofed). > If so, will the mac respond to queries for both > addresses? > If yes, then we can as well have a subnet of MAC > addresses similar to IP subnets assuming we assign > spoofed address in a specific logical sequence? > > Am i right? > > Please let me know! > > Thanks, > @Abhijit. > > --- Debajit Adhikary <[email protected]> wrote: > > abhijit wrote: > > > > > My question is if we have (or develop) an > > application > > > layer that understands MAC addresses( which is > > > unique), do we still need IP addresses? > > > > > > No you dont. > > > > But it would be a highly specialized solution > > tailored to your specialized > > needs, one that would only work (mostly) with your > > particular network, and > > would be difficult to manage, extend and maintain. > > > > Yes, it would work without IP addresses, and I see > > the following severe > > shortcomings to the solution: > > > > - Very Very Low Level > > - Very Difficult to maintain (You are > completely > > responsible -- you > > won't get much OS support at the higher level) > > - Very Difficult to extend (Look... tomorrow if > > you decide to change > > or add a new node to your n/w -- or use some > > other networking tech -- your > > MAC addresses will change -- I think I may be a > > little wrong here.... please > > correct me... and the solution may not work as > > expected) > > > > (I guess i went a lil overboard with the very's > :)) > > > > In general, as Kary and Gud pointed out, when you > > move to IP addresses, you > > abstact away from hardware details, and work in a > > "generic" manner -- hence > > a solution based on IP addresses is much more > > flexible and powerful... also > > it opens up a whole world of other possibilities. > > > > Hey Abhi.... why exactly do you want to do this > > anyway? Maybe you have > > something specific in mind? > > > > And hey... Abhi... wanna give IPv6 a try?! ;)) > > Well... Linux has been > > supporting it since as long as I know... Its gonna > > be the default in > > Longhorn i guess as well... :)) BTW... anyone here > > who's setup a IPv6 LAN? > > I'd like to try that sometime :)) > > > > luv > > Debu > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner > online > Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail