Re: Openoffice
Brad Barnett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:07:53 -0400 (EDT) Brett Delmage <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Jon Earle wrote: > > > I know you all hate Microsoft and their proprietary this that and the > > other... but dammit.... I'll give anything (well, not really, but you > > get the idea) for an office suite that actually works properly and > > consistently across three different computers!!! > > > Maybe your problem is different version behavior? Of course that is the issue. You're the first post to notice what Jon was complaining about, instead of just standing up for your buddy, your pal, Open Office the great. ;) Whatever one wants to say about Word, and Microsoft, they understand that backwards compatibility is paramount for documentation. Seriously, however, zeal and drive are great, but not if one over-represents something. For example, years ago I remember quite a few nutjobs running around, claiming that OpenOffice had perfect .doc import/export! pffft! Perfect my ass! It still is not perfect today, although it is significantly better. Claiming anything other than that, is only going to lead to embarrassment for those trying it, and anger as a response to that embarrassment. In a corporate environment, such a realization (that is, this product does not live up to its rep), that could literally slow down or stop adoption of open sauce software. Remember, suits are like most of the global warming nuts. They disbelieve issues unless they can see them, and believe issues when they see them, but aren't there. Oh look! Katrina was a result of global warming! Crop shortages are a result of global warming! Ah well. Hell guys, OOo is damned young. While some organizations are using it for *internal* docs, few I know are using it -- OCLUG general discussion list [email protected] http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug