References vs Pointers
"Jon Earle" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey folks!
Okay... simple one.
I have a test program to illustrate what I am working with. The class is
fixed - I cannot change its definition.
class myclass
{
public :
int *i;
};
// receive a reference to an int in the 2nd param.
void setval(myclass obj, int & x)
{
obj.i = x;
}
int main(void)
{
myclass mc;
int j = 10;
setval(mc, j);
return 0;
}
If I compile this, I get:
$ gcc -o ptrref ptrref.cpp
ptrref.cpp: In function void setval(myclass, int&):
ptrref.cpp:9: error: invalid conversion from int to int*
Now, I was under the impression that references were just a fancy word for
pointers, ie: a reference is an address of an object. So, why can I not
assign the reference to a pointer variable? Missing something, not sure
what.
Cheers!
Jon
--
OCLUG general discussion list
[email protected]
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug