Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Dawn Flood wrote:
> On 7/24/2026 5:51 AM, Andrew wrote:
>> "Attila" wrote in message 
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>  "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III 
>>>>>>> stated, namely, that "intelligent design is not a 
>>>>>>> legitimate scientific theory".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model".
>>>>>> And it is the~only one~that accords ->with the evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
>>>>>> model, would be to reject all of the evidence
>>>>>> that tells us it is.
>>>>>> One is free to do so.but then they identify
>>>>>> themselves to be a fool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Proponent Claims: Supporters argue that design detection
>>>>> relies on empirical data and standard methods of historical
>>>>> science to recognize intelligent agency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Scientific Consensus: The mainstream scientific community
>>>>> rejects ID as a scientific model, categorizing it instead as
>>>>> a form of creationism because it invokes unobservable,
>>>>> supernatural causes that cannot be tested or falsified
>>>>> through experimentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Legal and Educational Context: Courts (such as the 2005
>>>>> Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling) have determined that ID is
>>>>> religious in nature
>>>>
>>>> Yet every living thing came from an egg or seed that had 
>>>> ,__in digital code format__  ithe nstructions for the 
>>>> synthesis of that very thing.
>>>>
>>>> So you actually believe that instructions written in a
>>>> digital code could originate without the involvement
>>>> of an intelligent mind.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> Then you have a religious belief that rejects
>> anything that could possibly expose it to be
>> merely an unscientific and foolish *fantasy*.
>>
> 
> And, we have been through this before, Andrew.  DNA/RNA are 
> molecules, and molecules are composed of atoms, atoms are 
> composed of protons, neutrons and electrons; electrons appear to 
> be fundamental and not composed of anything and protons & 
> neutrons are composed of quarks, which also appear to be 
> fundamental.
> 
> It is the ability of DNA (especially) and RNA (likely, at the 
> beginning of life) to make copies of themselves with the help of 
> other molecules (proteins & enzymes) that is the basis of 
> chemical & biological evolution.
> 
> One must wonder why a Creator would take well over two billion 
> years to go from the first prokaryotic cells to the first 
> eukaryotic cells. Maybe such makes sense to you, but such does 
> not make sense to me.
> 
> On a related note, some people think that humans will colonize 
> Mars some day, but the Great Oxidation Event that led to our 
> oxygen atmosphere (which, of course, we need to breath) occurred 
> over the span of 250 million years.  And, so, where these people 
> who live on Mars someday are going to get all of their air is a 
> mystery to me!
> 
> Dawn

they will convert the co2 there to o2 and generate methane.