Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Attila <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:57:33 -0400
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:51:20 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>"Attila" wrote:   
>>>>  "Andrew" wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III stated, 
>>>>>> namely, that "intelligent design is not a legitimate scientific theory".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>>It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model". 
>>>>>
>>>>>And it is the~only one~that accords ->with 
>>>>>the evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
>>>>>model, would be to reject all of the evidence
>>>>>that tells us it is. 
>>>>>
>>>>>One is free to do so.but then they identify
>>>>>themselves to be a fool.
>>>> 
>>>> Proponent Claims: Supporters argue that design detection
>>>> relies on empirical data and standard methods of historical
>>>> science to recognize intelligent agency.
>>>> 
>>>> Scientific Consensus: The mainstream scientific community
>>>> rejects ID as a scientific model, categorizing it instead as
>>>> a form of creationism because it invokes unobservable,
>>>> supernatural causes that cannot be tested or falsified
>>>> through experimentation.
>>>> 
>>>> Legal and Educational Context: Courts (such as the 2005
>>>> Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling) have determined that ID is
>>>> religious in nature
>>>
>>>Yet every living thing came from an egg or seed that 
>>>had ,__in digital code format__  ithe nstructions for 
>>>the synthesis of that very thing.
>>>
>>>So you actually believe that instructions written in a
>>>digital code could originate without the involvement
>>>of an intelligent mind.
>> 
>> Yes.
>
>Then you have a religious belief that rejects
>anything that could possibly expose it to be
>merely an unscientific and foolish *fantasy*.
>
>

Sigh.  I have no religious beliefs no matter what you say. I
have seen nothing that supports the existence of any god and
I have no reason to think I am  not correct.

The physical conditions of the universe were set when it
came into being if it did not always exist.  If life was to
exist it must do so under the existing conditions.  Since
evolution requires life to try every conceivable situation
in order to continue there is no reason to think life as we
know it is not simply the current version of what works.
There may well be something else in the distant future.

The origional origin of life or the universe are other
issues not addressed here.

-- 


Every person in the US is here either  
legally or illegally. Those that are 
here illegally should be afraid.  
Be very afraid.  It does not matter 
how long you have been here.  It does 
not matter why you are here. It does not 
matter what you have done legally while you 
were here. It does not matter what any 
relative may have done while you were here. 
It only matters that you are here illegally. 
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer 
but we will find you and we will deport you. 
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process:
Q. Are you here legally?  If so, where is 
the documentation to establish that?

I support ending birthright citizenship

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting 
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

AA 966