Re: A.A.P.C. FOLKLORE, Part Forty-Five

> Will Dockery wrote:
> [email protected] (NancyGene) posted:
> 
>> Will Dockery <user3274> posted:
>> michaelmaleficapendragon@gmail-dot-com.(HarryLime) wrote:
>> 
>> MALLARD.
>> 
>> Mallard is a minister (possibly with the Church of the Holy
>> Barbers)
>> 
>> No, Mallard is a Deacon of a local Baptist church, not a minister.
>> 
>> Glad to clear up another misrepresentation of yours, Pendragon.
>> 
>> We see NO evidence
>> 
> 
> 
> Pendragon hasn't had any evidence throughout this entire folklore series, actually.
> 
> 



FIRST: The only evidence required for folklore, is examples of the story being told.  There are numerous examples of all of these stories in the A.A.P.C. archives.  When a story is repeated again and again over a period of time, it becomes folklore.

SECOND: I have examined each post, and pointed out whether that particular piece of folklore had a basis in historical fact, and to what degree it remained factual.  Nearly all of the folklore proved to have a very strong basis in fact, with a surprising number being 100 percent historically accurate. 


This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=709298620#709298620

-- 
Via JLA Forums web gateway for alt.arts.poetry.comments:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655