Re: Poem Recommendation
[email protected] (Will-Dockery)
| Newsgroups | alt.arts.poetry.comments |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> msifg wrote: > "Dale Houstman" <dmh7> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > >> msifg wrote: >> >> "FarStar" <ecowboy> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >> He's got to be the creepiest singer I've heard, maybe moreso the leonard >> cohen. Don't you think the doors are creepy, like charlie manson >> creepy, I do >> >> >> >> Jim was a natural prankster. >> He was a rock&roll gangster. >> He better be creepy. >> Otherwise, he's not being honest. >> >> He certainly could be embarrassing: I've seen live footage of him, and >> he's not so much "creepy" as "drunk" - he might be considered "creepy" in >> the way lonely Uncle Ginsock was creepy at the family reunions, but that's >> about as far as that goes. >> > > > "embarrassing" applies to jim in many ways. > he obviously had a garden variety of personality > defects coupled with a soaring IQ of 140. > that combination, mixed with drugs and booze > made him, sort of, obnoxious. his behavior > on more than one occasion, got him in all kinds > of trouble with the law. (lewdness, public drunkenness, > public disruption, inciting riots, vandalism, > and other pranks were his forte.) > > "creepy" would be from the perspective of his > painfully normal parents and people like them. > (nixon's silent majority.) > jim's long hair, wild stare and "obnoxious" behavior > contributed to the disowning of his parents. > (i'm sure those calls to home went quite well.) > his dad was an admiral in the navy. > can you imagine the tension btwn those two? > > > >> >> I like Henry Rollins for today's >> "Jim" like personality. >> >> They do have some similarities: Henry is also a pretentious who has pipe >> dreams about being a writer, but is really just a dumb block of wood with >> some paper and a pencil. >> > > > maybe so. but, henry's still young. > and, since he puts so much work into it, > he could still produce something brilliant. > of course, he ain't no morrisson. > however, very few in the pop spotlight > can claim that title, if any. > > >> >> However, Jim crept through >> the cracks of the vestal industry. >> >> They don't allow any "crazies" through the >> doors anymore. Too bad. That's where >> true art lies. >> >> Oh, there's still some loonies lurking about out there: the fact is, the >> vast majority of pop musicians in ANY era are essentially "normal" and >> merely professional rather than "crazy". >> > > > i disagree with ANY era. > the sixties came with more "open cracks." > we can split hairs when you say "the vast majority." > however, the amount of mediocre crap out there now > makes me believe your point applies more to today's > pop musicians. > please watch the first part of this real fast. > it explains my opinion better than i can. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UAWqwLjN70 > > > > >> (Cobain did sneak through. Maybe >> there's hope yet. There might still >> be a "crack" of hope.) >> >> Cobain's "crazy" might have been ameliorated with just a spoonful of >> stability. Crazy is fine, but suicidal really ruins the career. >> > > > haha- > the "spoonful" of stability you speak of exposes a horrible but accurate > pun. > he admitted on more than one occasion that heroin brought him > some stability. the fact is, he was a genuine nutcase. the man > had acute bipolar disorder. he also had acute irritable bowl > syndrome. he also had severe scoliosis. top all of that off with > a $400 a day heroin addiction which he definitely had the funds to > supply. kurt was a walking train wreck. i'm surprised he made it > as long as he did. > [/quote] Well put, "msifg." View the attachments for this post at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=710229451#710229451 This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658746610#658746610 -- Via JLA Forums web gateway for alt.arts.poetry.comments: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655