Re: R 3rd party lithium battery replacements safe & OK 2 use?
Paul <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:24:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 4/3/2025 3:50 PM, Ant wrote: > > Thanks Paul. I was debating to get new APC Replacement Battery Cartridge > (APCRBC124) battery replacements for my old 865 watts APC Back-UPSes: XS > 1500 (model: BX1500G) and APC Back-UPS XS 1500 (model BX1500G). One of > them show a blinking battery icon due to its old age. :( > The substitution of LiFePO4 for lead acid is a tempting one, but I've seen nothing substantial regarding "what could happen". Someone suggested "4S4P could work as an automotive battery replacement" some time ago, but I've never seen an authoritative analysis of the risk level associated with the idea. And if a battery with enough amperes to do the job for that size of UPS costs $1000, the idea is a non-starter. Lead acid has pretty good current flow capability, for a cheap battery type. Power-type LiCo could also work (they have twice the amperes of kilowatt-hour LiCo cells), but then the risk of fire goes up. LiCo will not accept any abuse. LiFePO4 will accept abuse. On a car battery, the terminal voltage drops from 12.6V (charged and settled) to 9.5V, when the load is 150 amps. That's to give you some idea what the impedance of the battery is. The drop across the battery (~3 volts) and 150 amps, means the battery develops 450 watts of heat inside it during that 5-10 second discharge. The Lithium can have a different impedance characteristic, but it could also be more sensitive to heat than the lumpy lead acid solution. If this idea was a big win, they would have done it already and these would be fitted to product at the store. I expect it is the cost which is unattractive. Once the battery manufacturing capability exceeds the market size, the price will drop closer to reality. Paul