Re: Fediverse newsgroup

Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]> wrote:
>Kyonshi wrote:
>>On 4/4/2024 12:13 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>Kyonshi <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>>I was thinking it might be good to have a group for discussions of the
>>>>fediverse (mastodon, pixelfed, et. al.) that is not on the fediverse
>>>>itself.

>>>>I was thinking about alt.comp.infosystems.fediverse

>>>If other people agree that the discussion should take place on Usenet,
>>>then you'll be able to find the discussion already taking place on
>>>Usenet. Discussion first, then decide if there's a need for a group. A
>>>dedicated group for discussion no one wants will fail.

>>That's why I'm asking here you know?

>What i understand Mr. Kerman to be saying is that newsgroups are only 
>created if people are already discussing the topic of the newsgroup _in 
>existing newsgroups_.

No. You misunderstood entirely. What I said is quoted above and doesn't
require reinterpretation.