Re: Fediverse newsgroup

On 4/5/2024 7:19 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Kyonshi wrote:
>>> On 4/4/2024 12:13 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>> Kyonshi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>>>> I was thinking it might be good to have a group for discussions of the
>>>>> fediverse (mastodon, pixelfed, et. al.) that is not on the fediverse
>>>>> itself.
> 
>>>>> I was thinking about alt.comp.infosystems.fediverse
> 
>>>> If other people agree that the discussion should take place on Usenet,
>>>> then you'll be able to find the discussion already taking place on
>>>> Usenet. Discussion first, then decide if there's a need for a group. A
>>>> dedicated group for discussion no one wants will fail.
> 
>>> That's why I'm asking here you know?
> 
>> What i understand Mr. Kerman to be saying is that newsgroups are only
>> created if people are already discussing the topic of the newsgroup _in
>> existing newsgroups_.
> 
> No. You misunderstood entirely. What I said is quoted above and doesn't
> require reinterpretation.

I dunno, it seemed to cover what you were saying.
Maybe it's not a problem with other people misunderstanding you, maybe 
it's more about you not expressing yourself in a way that can be 
understood.