Re: Huckster Joking Again...

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:05:06 -0800, Ben Holmes
<[email protected]> wrote:

>HENRY!!!
>
>Since you're clearly responding right now... let's see you run from
>this:
>
>Repost: Getting back to the evidence... a thing that believers HATE:
>
>"No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
>railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
>or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
>(WCR 61)
>
>Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
>a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
>accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
>lying. ...
>
>
>> Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial
>> system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as
>> you claim."
>
>
>You're lying again, Henry.
>
>More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.
>
>Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?
>
>******************************************************************
>
>Now tell us Henry... *where* did I state that the U.S. Judicial system
>accepts "all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence"?
>
>You stated that I'd made that claim.
>
>Now QUOTE ME SAYING SO!!!
>
>Or admit you've been caught "joking" again...
>
>Or run away again...
>
>(Such AMAZING cowardice!!!)


What's really funny is that even Chickenshit, who likes to reflexively
respond to anything I post - is silent.

He can't defend Huckster either.