Re: Huckster Sienzan - Proven Moron!
Ben Holmes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:03:23 -0800, Ben Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 7:27:12 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 9:26:23 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 06:51:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>You snipped what Bud wrote... >>>>> >>>>> Snipped again. >>>> >>>>So avoidance of the points made. Noted. >>> >>> Hypocrite, aren't you? >> >>Why do you say that, Ben? > > >I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be >pointed out... but they're true regardless. > > >>> P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the >>> location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is >>> described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs. >> >>Attempt to shift the burden of proof. > > >So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in >JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D??? > >You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit. Even Huckster is unwilling to defend Chickenshit's wacky assertion.