The Truth That WCR Believers Run From... #1

My Scenario Part 1 

First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do 
precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail, 
and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. I've done 
so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away. 

From Walter F. Graf and Richard R. Bartholomew: 

"From the beginning, there has been no reason to deny the conspiracy. 
Four of the seven Warren Commissioners -- the majority -- including 
the Commission's chairman, Chief Justice Earl Warren, expressed doubts
about the Commission's conclusions within a decade of their report. 
They were joined by a fifth Commissioner in 1978, when John J. McCloy 
told the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), that "I no 
longer feel we had no credible evidence or reliable evidence in regard
to a conspiracy...." Lyndon Johnson never believed the report he 
commissioned. The official policy of the FBI is that the case is not 
closed, a policy begun by J. Edgar Hoover himself. And those were the 
people who had supposedly found the truth. 

By any standard of historiography, the lone-assassin scenario must be 
considered a minority opinion which is contrary to the known evidence.
Yet that is not enough for a vocal minority of conspiracy deniers." 

Unfortunately, the sole kook who kept referring to the "historical 
record" - has left this forum, and refuses to defend himself anymore. 
But as Graf & Bartholomew point out, there never has been anything 
other than a minority opinion which is CONTRARY TO THE KNOWN 
EVIDENCE... as I write this scenario, I'll be pointing out time and 
time again the evidence which conflicts with the tale told by the 
Commission (and not even supported by a majority of those 
Commissioners as more information came to light.) 

Now, while it's true that I've challenged believers many times to post
their scenario, it's clear that Conan was the last believer who would 
ever *DARE* do so. 

And Chickenshit is going to continue to claim that no scenario has
ever been posted by a critic. 

He'll be lying, of course... watch, as I dismantle the Warren 
Commission's case and present my scenario... 

(And yes, it's impossible to post a conspiratorial scenario *without* 
demolishing the Warren Commission's.) 

This **IS** a scenario - despite any whining from believers who can't 
post their scenario... and it does indeed conflict with, and explain 
the evidence better than the Warren Commission did. 

This post, in all it's parts, meets ANY POSSIBLE DEFINITION of 
"scenario" that Chickenshit can post... yet I predict that he'll deny
that I've posted a scenario... watch for it! 

The most interesting beginning for any investigation into the 
assassination would be the two prior assassination attempts - one in 
Chicago, and one in Tampa. (Some would also include Miami and LA 
attempts.) Believers like to deny these - but the Tampa attempt was 
documented in the newspaper - so believers are stuck with accepting a 
fact that they cannot explain. 

http://thechicagoplot.com/The%20Chicago%20Plot.pdf 
http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2012/07/tampa-plot-in-retrospect.html
So we have a background of attempted assassination attempts in the 
weeks before the successful one... most people would find it hard to 
believe that all three plots were not connected in some manner - this 
is simply common sense. And when you do a comparison of the potential 
patsies, it becomes difficult indeed to reject the common sense 
conspiracy: 

https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-three-failed-plots-to-kill-jfk-the-historians-guide-on-how-to-research-his-assassination#PointsOfComparison
It's truly amusing to note that *NO* believer has ever publicly 
acknowledged these previous assassination attempts, or explained them 
in terms of a lone assassin. The Warren Commission certainly did not -
and that's a *MAJOR* failing for such a large investigation to have 
missed. 

Any *real* investigation would certainly start with a search for 
anything unusual that had PRECEDED the murder - in order to shed light
on the murder itself. This is simply common sense, and something that 
real investigators do routinely. Wife dies? Check to see if the 
husband recently paid for a new insurance policy. Post Office shot up 
by suspect? Examine his prior history with the Post Office, examine 
how sane he was in the weeks prior... etc. 

As David Talbot observed: "Kennedy was, in fact, being methodically 
stalked in the final weeks of his life... In the final month of his 
life, John Kennedy seemed a marked man, encircled by a tightening knot
of treachery." 

The Warren Commission refused to do any investigation WHATSOEVER into 
these prior assassination attempts, and the Secret Service provably 
helped by not providing any information to the Warren Commission... 
This is a fact that cannot be explained by believers in any credible 
manner. Indeed, in later years the Secret Service intentionally 
destroyed files that would be requested by the HSCA & ARRB, and 
*should* have been examined by the Warren Commission. 

Chickenshit will not even *try* to provide non-conspiratorial
explanations for these facts. Watch! I've predicted it. 

(And the first time this was posted, Chickenshit indeed simply ran
from each of these posts - never responding to a single one of them.
But let's not forget Chuckles, Von Penis, Corbutt, and Huckster's
cowardice as well.)