Re: Uncovering the fallacies of TGB and the like

On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:53:18 -0700 (PDT), Peter Riden
<[email protected]> wrote:

...
>Stuffy finally accepting your presentation which obviously is very
>much like mine... minus the labels.

Peter, I agree that you are giving nudists the freedom to swing at
your place. That's not the issue. 

You are also giving non-nudists the freedom to swing. Nudists and
non-nudists, all at the same time and place, all swinging...

That makes you a swinger place, not a nudist place. 

Here's why. At a swinger place, a person should know that they might
encounter explicit sexual activity. No problem. At a nudist place,
like Haulover or Gunnison, a person should know that they might
encounter nudity, but certainly not explicit sexual activity. 

Peter, why does that give you a problem?

When you don't call yourself a nudist resort, I don't care. When you
come on Rec.Nude and float the trial balloon that you are a nudist
resort, I do care. I'm not saying you can't be both. I'm saying you
cannot be both at the same place and time.

Nudism and Swinging are not the same thing. Why does that give you a
problem?