Re: [2013-2015] Affirmative Action Lands In The Air Traffic Control Tower
pothead <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Feb 2025 23:43:51 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,alt.discrimination,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Libtard Rehabilitation Program |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-02-01, Leroy N. Soetoro <[email protected]> wrote: > https://manhattan.institute/article/affirmative-action-lands-in-the-air- > traffic-control-tower > > The Obama administration forces the Federal Aviation Administration to > move away from merit-based hiring criteria. > > When a plane start >>> quit. s its final descent, are the passengers more concerned > about the competence or about the skin color of the air-traffic > controllers on the ground who will help the pilot land safely? The answer > may be obvious to readers, if not to the Obama administration. > > A recently completed six-month investigation by Fox Business Network found > that the Federal Aviation Administration has quietly moved away from > merit-based hiring criteria in order to increase the number of women and > minorities who staff airport control towers. The changes come despite the > fact that the FAA's own internal reports describe the evidence for > changing the hiring process as weak. > > Until 2013, the FAA gave hiring preference to controller applicants who > earned a degree from one of its Collegiate Training Initiative schools and > scored high enough on an eight-hour screening test called the Air Traffic > Selection and Training exam, or AT-SAT, which measures cognitive skills. > The Obama administration, however, determined that the process excluded > too many from minority groups. In May 2013, the FAA's civil rights > administrator issued barrier analyses of the agency's employment > procedures, which recommended revising how the AT-SAT is used in > establishing best-qualified lists. > > By the start of last year, the FAA was using a biographical questionnaire > (BQ) to initially vet potential hires. The questionsHow many sports did > you play in high school?, What has been the major cause of your > failures?seem designed to elicit stories of personal disadvantage or > family hardship rather than determine success on the job. > > The FAA says it created the BQ to promote diversity among its workforce, > reported Adam Shapiro of Fox Business. All air traffic control applicants > are required to take it. Those who pass are deemed eligible and those who > fail are ruled ineligible. > > The FAA would not tell Fox Business what the biographical test is trying > to measure and did not return my phone calls. But an FAA report released > in October, Using Biodata to Select Air Traffic Controllers, concluded > that the AT-SAT exam, not the biographical questionnaire, is a much better > predictor of performance. The biodata items assessed did little to > improve our ability to select applicants most likely to complete training > successfully, said the study. If biodata are to be used to select > controllers, additional research is required to identify those biodata > items that will add to the prediction of controller training performance > over and above the effect of AT-SAT score. > > Given that training an air-traffic controller can cost more than $400,000 > on average, selecting candidates based on who is likely to complete the > process makes economic sense. Hans Bader, a legal scholar at the > Competitive Enterprise Institute, writes that the FAA's focus on diversity > is not only inefficient but may be a violation of the Civil Rights Act. > The FAA's jettisoning of merit-based hiring criteria violated the Supreme > Court's Ricci decision, [Ricci v. DeStefano, 2009] which limits agencies' > ability to discard hiring criteria in order to increase minority > representation, especially when there is no strong evidence that the > criteria are not job-related, said Mr. Bader. > > After the FAA changed its screening process in 2014, thousands of > applicants who were already in the pipelinepeople who had obtained an > FAA-accredited degree, taken the AT-SAT exam and had been designated > well-qualified to become air-traffic controllerswere told by the > government that they would have to start the process again. But this > time, when they applied for a job, their college degrees and previous > military experience would mean nothing, reported Fox Business. They > would now compete with thousands of people the agency calls off the > street hires'; anyone who wants to, can walk in off the street without any > previous training and apply for an air traffic control job. > > In other words, the current policy is to deliberately favor less-qualified > applicants over more qualified applicants in the name of obtaining the > right racial and gender mix among air-traffic controllers. Advocates of > diversity insist that discounting objective measures of ability and > competence is harmless, but history shows that it can be deadly. > > In 1973 Patrick Chavis was one of five black students admitted to a > medical school in California through an affirmative-action program > designed to increase minority enrollment. Allan Bakke, a white applicant > who was rejected despite having much higher test scores than the black > applicants, sued. In 1978 the Supreme Court struck down the program, but > Chavis would go on to earn his medical degree and become a poster child > for advocates of racial preferences. In 1995 he made the cover of the New > York Times magazine. Sen. Ted Kennedy called him the perfect example of > how affirmative action worked. In 1998 the California medical board > revoked Chavis's medical license, noting his inability to perform some of > the most basic duties required of a physician after several patients in > his care died or were severely injured. > > Admitting poorly qualified students to medical school increases the number > of incompetent doctors. A selection process for air-traffic controllers > that favors race and gender over ability is no less dangerous. > > This piece originally appeared in The Wall Street Journal. DEI is a disaster and does nothing good for anyone. At least with a doctor a person can do some research and choose a good one assuming it's not an emergency of course. How do I choose an ATC who is guiding the plane I am sitting in to a landing? I can't. -- pothead Why did Joe Biden pardon his family? Read below to learn the reason. The Biden Crime Family Timeline here: https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/