Re: Water kettle energy consumption logging
<[email protected]> Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:55:14 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.energy.homepower |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wu Ming <[email protected] > wrote: > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Watt-hours. Required to keep water around the temperature on the first >>> column. >>> >> Then I'm confused..... >> > We have a Chinese model. I don’t read Chinese but just realized that > version of the manual shows W/h. The English version has Wh instead. Even > without knowing before I assumed what they meant was watts per hour. It > won’t make sense otherwise. In this context neither watt-hours nor watts/hr make sense. "...keep water around the temperature..." implies a steady state process. That is expressed in energy per unit time. A watt is exactly that unit, expressed in joules per second. It seems likely that something got scrambled in translation. Regardless, Jim Wilkins has, I think, expressed the solution: Keep the average temperature as low as possible to maximize the efficiency over the timescale of interest. Unless there's a known schedule for demand the only solution is to keep the water at the required temperature continuously. hth, bob prohaska