Re: We had

hells bells wrote:
> 
> On 11/15/2024 2:05 AM, K Wills wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:53:28 -0700, hells bells <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On 11/14/2024 1:44 AM, K Wills wrote:
> >>> I can't be bothered with devoting time to reading anything he,
> >>> or anyone else, posted years ago.
> >>
> >> Your deceased Bob Larson stalking friend Maureen's hate posts are still up:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://foreverknightfa.livejournal.com/132726.html
> >>
> > 
> > I didn't care about them when she was alive. 
> 
> Yes you did, and it consumed years of your cyberlife over on 
> alt.fan.bob-larson.
> 
> The archive of what you and disbarred attorney-in-waiting Ken Smith did 
> is extensive.
> 
> > I don't care about them now.
> 
> As a classic narcissist, that may actually be true.
> 
> In fact when Maureen passed away you said not one word of it online, 
> despite Moe being your most ardent supporter and duped defender.
> 
> > How badly did she embarrass you that years after she died, you're
> > still trying to regain some of what you lost to her?
> 
> The vampire fangirl embarrassed only herself and likely some of her family.
> 
> But boy howdy when I bring the context and archive back for you, all of 
> a sudden you start responding with counter-punches, not mere deflections 
> and lies.
> 
> I knew this would work, and so it has!
> 
> :-)
> 
> >>
> >> https://www.westword.com/news/the-devil-made-him-do-it-5053743
> >>
> >> The vitriol that drips from Smith's articles and pamphlets about BLM
> >> apparently has led Larson's lawyers to describe Smith's actions as
> >> systematic efforts to discredit Bob Larson Ministries. But Smith is the
> >> last person to admit that he's obsessed with bringing Larson to his
> >> knees. In spite of the sheer volume of material he has compiled, he
> >> insists that he would be more than pleased if his conflict with Larson
> >> would simply cease to exist. Still, he's not willing to wave the white
> >> flag. "This is going to go away on his terms or on my terms," he says.
> >> "And I'm not going to let it go away on his terms.
> >>
> > 
> > How badly did Smith embarrass you that more than a decade since
> > he left Usenet, you're still trying to get some sort of revenge?
> 
> Back to the programmed obfuscatory accusations.
> 
> He actually trashed his own law degree by passing the Colorado state bar 
> examand then being denied a license to practice law based on his and 
> your aggressive cyber-stalking of Rev. Bob Larson.
> 
> The legal record is unassailable on this one.
> 
> > If you have a problem with Ken Smith, you should take it up with
> > Ken Smith. Crying about it on Usenet only serves to further PROVE you
> > are as mentally unstable as you suggest.
> 
> The context of your stalking activities in concert with Ken Smith is not 
> a "problem", or at least not for me!
> 
> >> https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=alt.fan.bob-larson&mid=PGM5MzU2MWUxLTc0NDktNGExYy1iNjY2LTJkYTc1NmI0ODNlM0BhOGcyMDAweXFwLmdvb2dsZWdyb3Vwcy5jb20%2B
> >>
> >> Kent and the BOAT registration
> >>
> > 
> > I will presume you mean me when you write Kent. Even though you
> > KNOW that isn't my name. Even William has accepted this truth.
> 
> Back to your programmed deflections and denials.
> 
> I thought the whole boat decal charade was as loony as your forged 
> boarding pass photos from your alleged Aruba trips with Lin.
> 
> LOL.
> 
> You're  crackers Kent!
> 
> > 
> >> 1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
> > 
> >       I did. A nice red one. The color will become important later.
> 
> But you have been claiming NOT to be that Kent Wills, until now...
> 
> :-0
> 
> 
> >>
> >> 2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
> >>
> > 
> >       It was registered. Nothing odd about that to the mentally sound.
> > While I don't recall claiming that it was registered, if I did, this
> > wouldn't be an indication of anything other than I stated it was
> > registered.
> 
> Why did you post pics of it online then?
> 
> >> 3. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
> >>
> > 
> >       Are you suggesting it wasn't registered?
> >       You do realize your claim ruins everything below, right?
> 
> I didn't write this quoted piece Kent, you know that.
> 
> >> 4. Kent's posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
> >>
> > 
> >       Actually, the water and shore. You couldn't see much of the boat
> > since it was filmed from within the boat. But show us the video you
> > claim exists. Unless you're lying, of course.
> > 
> > [Cue deceptive avoidance on Hells part.]
> 
> I can't show you any videos that have been scrubbed from the net, but it 
> would be a real knee-sapper should I search some out - shall I continue 
> working on that?
> 
> Maybe when archive.org gets working again one day.
> 
> >> 5. posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep purchase)
> >>
> > 
> >       My memory is of buying it in late August. Maybe it was early
> > September. It's not a matter of concern for me. I don't see when it
> > was bought means anything.
> 
> Non sequitur Punch and Judy act, Kent.
> 
> >> 6. The boat registration was plainly visible. IA 6312 WW
> >>
> > 
> >       Nope. But present your best evidence that it was visible. Since
> > you're lying, you will only attempt to divert.
> >       Further, what color was the boat with the registration you cite?
> > Hint: It wasn't red, but blue. Vox failed to pay attention to the
> > color. Oops.
> 
> Who is "Vox"?
> 
> What is your relationship with that entity you just revealed?
> 
> 
> >> (1989 Bluefin)
> >>
> > 
> >       I suspect, but cannot prove, this is where Vox got confused.
> > Bluefin is the boat model, but he thought it meant the boat's color.
> 
> So who was the "Vox" entity Kenty?
> 
> And what was so important to it about your having a boat registration?
> 
> 
> >> 7. Iowa boat registration revealed it was registered to
> >>
> >> Dale and Judy Caquelin 105 Southfield Webster City, Iowa
> >>
> > 
> >       The registration Vox posted did. However, as was shown, the
> > registration for the boat I owned wasn't shown in pictures or video.
> > Vox just found something he thought he could claim was the boat
> > without fact checking himself.
> 
> OK, so it's a he that you had some beef with, right?
> 
> >> ( In Webster City IA where Bill and Tiffany once lived)
> >>
> > 
> >       Maybe they did. What relevance does that have?
> 
> Beats me, why don't you explain who they are/were and what your 
> relationship with them is/was?
> 
> >> ( Kent denied they lived there, but records show they did. )
> >>
> > 
> >       I denied I have a sister, by any name, who ever lived in Webster
> > City. But you will present the evidence that I did have one. If you're
> > lying, you won't offer the evidence since it will not exist. And
> > proving the Kent Wills from Webster City has a sister who also lived
> > there once won't work. You must prove one of MY sisters did.
> >       Quoting that which has been proved wrong will only serve to
> > further prove you really are as mentally unstable as you present.
> 
> LOLOLOL!
> 
> That's a whole LOT of denials and details that you have been ducking for 
> years now...
> 
> >> 8. Kent supposedly called boat registration after 4:30
> >>
> > 
> >       I did? I may have. Lacking your unhealthy OBSESSION, I couldn't
> > be bothered to memorize what time of day I made any calls to anyone or
> > any place.
> 
> That's nice, so?
> 
> >> 9. Kent lied about phone hours for boat registration office
> >>
> > 
> >       I did?
> >       I can't speak to its current hours. One could call after 4:30pm
> > back then. It was hit or miss if anyone would be available to answer.
> 
> Lol.
> 
> >> 10. Kent removed his entire youtube account etc.
> >>
> > 
> >       Yet it still exists. 
> 
> Where?
> 
> About
> 
> Channel details
> www.youtube.com/@BraveNewWorld61
> 233 subscribers
> 159 videos
> 40,348 views
> Joined Jan 5, 2007
> 
> No, that ain't it..
> 
> Nor are the other ones that come up in youtube search, are they Kenty?
> 
> 
> > I don't post any videos to it anymore. And
> > haven't for many years. I post such things to Facebook.
> 
> That's nice, a good safe cyberspace to hidey hole yourself in.
> 
> >       But present your best evidence for your claim. If you're simply
> > providing more evidence that you have issues that should be addressed
> > with a mental health care professional, you will offer only avoidance,
> > if you don't run away from the truth.
> 
> That's just more Commiela grade word salad, Kenty.
> 
> >> The Kent Wills saga continues..
> > 
> >       Why are you so OBSESSED with Kent? Claiming I am someone I have
> > been proved not to be doesn't really help you. Do you really think
> > yours is mentally sound behavior?
> 
> You just answered above as Kent Wills, are you losing your marbles or is 
> it some form of dissociative MPD?
> 
> >       What did I do to embarrass you so much that you are this
> > DESPERATE to try, and fail, to regain whatever it is your delusions
> > cause you to believe I took from you?
> 
> I never claimed you took a thing from me.
> 
> Why would you allege such an easily proven lie?
> 
> 
> > [Cue "hells"playing avoidance games.]
> 
> Thanks for confirming the verity of the links tendered.
> 
> It's a crying shame that GooGoo ended usenet support because the 
> alt.fan.bob-larson archive is a massive honeypot of your bizarre 
> activities over the years Kent.

That's him told. Well done.