Re: We had

William Stickers wrote:
> hells bells wrote:
>>
>> On 11/15/2024 2:05 AM, K Wills wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:53:28 -0700, hells bells <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/14/2024 1:44 AM, K Wills wrote:
>>>>> I can't be bothered with devoting time to reading anything he,
>>>>> or anyone else, posted years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Your deceased Bob Larson stalking friend Maureen's hate posts are still up:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://foreverknightfa.livejournal.com/132726.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't care about them when she was alive.
>>
>> Yes you did, and it consumed years of your cyberlife over on
>> alt.fan.bob-larson.
>>
>> The archive of what you and disbarred attorney-in-waiting Ken Smith did
>> is extensive.
>>
>>> I don't care about them now.
>>
>> As a classic narcissist, that may actually be true.
>>
>> In fact when Maureen passed away you said not one word of it online,
>> despite Moe being your most ardent supporter and duped defender.
>>
>>> How badly did she embarrass you that years after she died, you're
>>> still trying to regain some of what you lost to her?
>>
>> The vampire fangirl embarrassed only herself and likely some of her family.
>>
>> But boy howdy when I bring the context and archive back for you, all of
>> a sudden you start responding with counter-punches, not mere deflections
>> and lies.
>>
>> I knew this would work, and so it has!
>>
>> :-)
>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.westword.com/news/the-devil-made-him-do-it-5053743
>>>>
>>>> The vitriol that drips from Smith's articles and pamphlets about BLM
>>>> apparently has led Larson's lawyers to describe Smith's actions as
>>>> systematic efforts to discredit Bob Larson Ministries. But Smith is the
>>>> last person to admit that he's obsessed with bringing Larson to his
>>>> knees. In spite of the sheer volume of material he has compiled, he
>>>> insists that he would be more than pleased if his conflict with Larson
>>>> would simply cease to exist. Still, he's not willing to wave the white
>>>> flag. "This is going to go away on his terms or on my terms," he says.
>>>> "And I'm not going to let it go away on his terms.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How badly did Smith embarrass you that more than a decade since
>>> he left Usenet, you're still trying to get some sort of revenge?
>>
>> Back to the programmed obfuscatory accusations.
>>
>> He actually trashed his own law degree by passing the Colorado state bar
>> examand then being denied a license to practice law based on his and
>> your aggressive cyber-stalking of Rev. Bob Larson.
>>
>> The legal record is unassailable on this one.
>>
>>> If you have a problem with Ken Smith, you should take it up with
>>> Ken Smith. Crying about it on Usenet only serves to further PROVE you
>>> are as mentally unstable as you suggest.
>>
>> The context of your stalking activities in concert with Ken Smith is not
>> a "problem", or at least not for me!
>>
>>>> https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=alt.fan.bob-larson&mid=PGM5MzU2MWUxLTc0NDktNGExYy1iNjY2LTJkYTc1NmI0ODNlM0BhOGcyMDAweXFwLmdvb2dsZWdyb3Vwcy5jb20%2B
>>>>
>>>> Kent and the BOAT registration
>>>>
>>>
>>> I will presume you mean me when you write Kent. Even though you
>>> KNOW that isn't my name. Even William has accepted this truth.
>>
>> Back to your programmed deflections and denials.
>>
>> I thought the whole boat decal charade was as loony as your forged
>> boarding pass photos from your alleged Aruba trips with Lin.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> You're  crackers Kent!
>>
>>>
>>>> 1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
>>>
>>>        I did. A nice red one. The color will become important later.
>>
>> But you have been claiming NOT to be that Kent Wills, until now...
>>
>> :-0
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        It was registered. Nothing odd about that to the mentally sound.
>>> While I don't recall claiming that it was registered, if I did, this
>>> wouldn't be an indication of anything other than I stated it was
>>> registered.
>>
>> Why did you post pics of it online then?
>>
>>>> 3. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        Are you suggesting it wasn't registered?
>>>        You do realize your claim ruins everything below, right?
>>
>> I didn't write this quoted piece Kent, you know that.
>>
>>>> 4. Kent's posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        Actually, the water and shore. You couldn't see much of the boat
>>> since it was filmed from within the boat. But show us the video you
>>> claim exists. Unless you're lying, of course.
>>>
>>> [Cue deceptive avoidance on Hells part.]
>>
>> I can't show you any videos that have been scrubbed from the net, but it
>> would be a real knee-sapper should I search some out - shall I continue
>> working on that?
>>
>> Maybe when archive.org gets working again one day.
>>
>>>> 5. posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep purchase)
>>>>
>>>
>>>        My memory is of buying it in late August. Maybe it was early
>>> September. It's not a matter of concern for me. I don't see when it
>>> was bought means anything.
>>
>> Non sequitur Punch and Judy act, Kent.
>>
>>>> 6. The boat registration was plainly visible. IA 6312 WW
>>>>
>>>
>>>        Nope. But present your best evidence that it was visible. Since
>>> you're lying, you will only attempt to divert.
>>>        Further, what color was the boat with the registration you cite?
>>> Hint: It wasn't red, but blue. Vox failed to pay attention to the
>>> color. Oops.
>>
>> Who is "Vox"?
>>
>> What is your relationship with that entity you just revealed?
>>
>>
>>>> (1989 Bluefin)
>>>>
>>>
>>>        I suspect, but cannot prove, this is where Vox got confused.
>>> Bluefin is the boat model, but he thought it meant the boat's color.
>>
>> So who was the "Vox" entity Kenty?
>>
>> And what was so important to it about your having a boat registration?
>>
>>
>>>> 7. Iowa boat registration revealed it was registered to
>>>>
>>>> Dale and Judy Caquelin 105 Southfield Webster City, Iowa
>>>>
>>>
>>>        The registration Vox posted did. However, as was shown, the
>>> registration for the boat I owned wasn't shown in pictures or video.
>>> Vox just found something he thought he could claim was the boat
>>> without fact checking himself.
>>
>> OK, so it's a he that you had some beef with, right?
>>
>>>> ( In Webster City IA where Bill and Tiffany once lived)
>>>>
>>>
>>>        Maybe they did. What relevance does that have?
>>
>> Beats me, why don't you explain who they are/were and what your
>> relationship with them is/was?
>>
>>>> ( Kent denied they lived there, but records show they did. )
>>>>
>>>
>>>        I denied I have a sister, by any name, who ever lived in Webster
>>> City. But you will present the evidence that I did have one. If you're
>>> lying, you won't offer the evidence since it will not exist. And
>>> proving the Kent Wills from Webster City has a sister who also lived
>>> there once won't work. You must prove one of MY sisters did.
>>>        Quoting that which has been proved wrong will only serve to
>>> further prove you really are as mentally unstable as you present.
>>
>> LOLOLOL!
>>
>> That's a whole LOT of denials and details that you have been ducking for
>> years now...
>>
>>>> 8. Kent supposedly called boat registration after 4:30
>>>>
>>>
>>>        I did? I may have. Lacking your unhealthy OBSESSION, I couldn't
>>> be bothered to memorize what time of day I made any calls to anyone or
>>> any place.
>>
>> That's nice, so?
>>
>>>> 9. Kent lied about phone hours for boat registration office
>>>>
>>>
>>>        I did?
>>>        I can't speak to its current hours. One could call after 4:30pm
>>> back then. It was hit or miss if anyone would be available to answer.
>>
>> Lol.
>>
>>>> 10. Kent removed his entire youtube account etc.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        Yet it still exists.
>>
>> Where?
>>
>> About
>>
>> Channel details
>> www.youtube.com/@BraveNewWorld61
>> 233 subscribers
>> 159 videos
>> 40,348 views
>> Joined Jan 5, 2007
>>
>> No, that ain't it..
>>
>> Nor are the other ones that come up in youtube search, are they Kenty?
>>
>>
>>> I don't post any videos to it anymore. And
>>> haven't for many years. I post such things to Facebook.
>>
>> That's nice, a good safe cyberspace to hidey hole yourself in.
>>
>>>        But present your best evidence for your claim. If you're simply
>>> providing more evidence that you have issues that should be addressed
>>> with a mental health care professional, you will offer only avoidance,
>>> if you don't run away from the truth.
>>
>> That's just more Commiela grade word salad, Kenty.
>>
>>>> The Kent Wills saga continues..
>>>
>>>        Why are you so OBSESSED with Kent? Claiming I am someone I have
>>> been proved not to be doesn't really help you. Do you really think
>>> yours is mentally sound behavior?
>>
>> You just answered above as Kent Wills, are you losing your marbles or is
>> it some form of dissociative MPD?
>>
>>>        What did I do to embarrass you so much that you are this
>>> DESPERATE to try, and fail, to regain whatever it is your delusions
>>> cause you to believe I took from you?
>>
>> I never claimed you took a thing from me.
>>
>> Why would you allege such an easily proven lie?
>>
>>
>>> [Cue "hells"playing avoidance games.]
>>
>> Thanks for confirming the verity of the links tendered.
>>
>> It's a crying shame that GooGoo ended usenet support because the
>> alt.fan.bob-larson archive is a massive honeypot of your bizarre
>> activities over the years Kent.
> 
> That's him told. Well done.
> 
kent is great he pisses off all the guys i don't like