Re: Kamela Harris on 60 minutes = FAIL

On 10/12/2024 2:03 PM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> On 10/12/2024 11:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, 
> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another 
> content-free batch of lies:
> 
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected] says...
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2024 3:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off 
>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another 
>>> content-free batch
>>> of lies:
>>>
>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/11/2024 2:52 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off 
>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another 
>>>>> content-free batch
>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 11:43 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off 
>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted 
>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 10:35 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off 
>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted 
>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <%[email protected]>, 
>>>>>>>>>> byKKKer@do~rag.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 9:25 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-11 05:19, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09 15:28, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09 05:01, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09, NoBody <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:40:38 -0700, Alan 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-08 10:34, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vice President Kamala Harris was pressed by CBS 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> News' Bill Whitaker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about whether it was a "mistake" for the Biden 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration to go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soft on its border policies during a tense exchange 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Monday's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special election episode of "60 Minutes."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You recently visited the southern border and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embraced President
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden's recent crackdown on asylum seekers, and that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crackdown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> produced an almost immediate and dramatic decrease 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border crossings," Whitaker said. "If that's the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right answer now, why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't your administration take those steps in 2021?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The first bill we proposed to Congress was to fix 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our broken
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system, knowing that if you want to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually fix it, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need Congress to act. It was not taken up," Harris 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responded. "Fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward to a moment when a bipartisan group of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members of the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States Senate, including one of the most 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative members of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> United States Senate, got together, came up with a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border security
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bill.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Well, guess what happened? Donald Trump got word 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this bill was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afoot and could be passed, and he wants to run on a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing a problem. So he told his buddies in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Congress, 'Kill the bill,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't let it move forward.'"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I've been covering the border for years, and so I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know this is not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that started with your administration," 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whitaker said. "But
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there was an historic flood of undocumented 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants coming across
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the border the first three years of your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration. As a matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of fact, arrivals quadrupled from the last year of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President Trump."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Was it a mistake to loosen the immigration policies 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as much as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did?" Whitaker then asked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It's a long-standing problem, and solutions are at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, and from day
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one, literally, we have been offering solutions," 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris responded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/60-minutes-asks-harris-whether-mistake-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> biden-admin-go-soft-border-vp-repeatedly-dodges?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fbclid=IwY2xjawFyTABleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHU7b1A3i67zYH1ZuuRcDgOkGCtU25HYve9RL5lNUqEw1DXjdyJOP88WFjg_aem_oRywo9a6LtumpPT67x6Nsw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No she has not offered solutions.  That bill did 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to strengthen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the border and repeating the lie doesn't make it true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the bill did nothing to strengthen the border...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...why did Trump want it killed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it spent a bunch of money that did nothing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That bill would have codified illegal immigration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a disaster and Republicans who were in favor of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it obviously did not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read the bill because it was awful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote an "awful" provision of that bill.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Money to Ukraine. That's not our border.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Money for Ukraine was not in the last version of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border bill.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it was.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the text of the bill:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4361/text>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The word "Ukraine" does not appear in the bill. Skeeter-Shit 
>>>>>>>>>>> "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester, lifelong failure 
>>>>>>>>>>> and fucking
>>>>>>>>>>> do-nothing, is lying once again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yet poor lying Rudy can't defend what he says here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bill does not address aid to Ukraine or any other country. 
>>>>>>>>> You lied.>
>>>>>>>> Yet Prof. Canoza, my intellectual, moral, professional, social, 
>>>>>>>> literary and physical superior, can't defend what he says here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have proved that you lied about the border bill by saying it 
>>>>>>> provided aid>> money to Ukraine. It did not. You lied in saying 
>>>>>>> that it did, and now you're
>>>>>>> lying about your lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You never have proved anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have proved thousands of things here. Most recently, I have 
>>>>> proved that you
>>>>> lied about the border bill by saying it provided aid>> money to 
>>>>> Ukraine. It did
>>>>> not. You lied in saying that it did, and now you're lying about 
>>>>> your lying.
>>>>
>>>> You didn't prove anything.
>>>
>>> I proved that you lied about the border bill, and then I proved you 
>>> lied about
>>> your lying.
>>>
>>> I always prove my points.
>>
>> You proved nothing.
> 
> I proved that you lied about the border bill, and then I proved you lied 
> about your lying.
You proved nothing except that you lie a lot.

> I always poop my pants.
That too.