Re: AOC pushes Democratic Party to distance itself from 'Obama-era insiders' - "QUEER LOSERS"!
Vanishing Walz <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:19:11 -0800
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns,alt.fun,sac.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,alt.fan.chad-bryant |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mixmin |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/27/2024 11:24 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 11/27/2024 10:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless > chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: > >> >> >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "John Smyth" <[email protected]> wrote in message news: >>>> %[email protected]... >>>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken Virginia >>>>>> camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, >>>>>> lied: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:5qq%[email protected]... >>>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me... >>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be >>>>>>>>>>>> delayed >>>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for >>>>>>>>>>>> dismissal, >>>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity >>>>>>>>>>>> acknowedging >>>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing >>>>>>>>>>> delayed. >>>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media >>>>>>>>>>> announsement. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay >>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his >>>>>>>>>>> hush money >>>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will >>>>>>>>>>> still fight >>>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed." >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald >>>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and >>>>>>>>>> his trial >>>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false >>>>>>>>> application of the >>>>>>>>> law. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's >>>>>>>> application of the law was impeccable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really? > > Yes, really, scooter. > >>>>>>> The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for >>>>>>> which he was performing a coverup of? > > Asked and answered, scooter. You're running in circles, scooter. > >>>>>> >>>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven >>>>>> crimes. >>>>> >>>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because >>>>> they didn't have to. >>>> >>>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he cover >>>> them up? >>> >>> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get >>> someone else to commit them, scooter. >> >> Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court. > That's a lie, scooter. The intent being established is *exactly why* the > jury convicted Trump of 34 counts of violating §175.10 (felony) The trial was rigged to discredit Trump and the whore who violated the NDA walked.