Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

"Tyrone"  wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...

On Jun 3, 2024 at 2:04:59 AM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote:

> I don't assume that. I prove that. Why no jumps? Why no stars? Why flags
> fluttering? Why deep footprints? Why chaps leaning forward! Why C rock?
> How the great photos? Who took the famous photo with the other one
> clearly not taking it as its showed on the visor? Etc. etc.

OMG. That's it?  That's your "proof"?  They are all incredibly stupid. I'll
pick one at random.

Why would you expect to see stars in the pictures? You need long exposure
photos IN THE DARK to see stars, because stars are VERY DIM. There are no
stars in the Lunar pictures because they are in full daylight.  They are
taking pictures of nearby people and objects that are very brightly lit. 
That
the sky is black has nothing to do with anything.

Here is your test. Go outside on a clear night, when there are stars. You 
and
a friend stand under a street light. You take a normal picture of your 
friend,
lit from above by the street light. If there are no street lights and it is
dark, then use the camera flash. Then tell us how many stars you see in the
background.

The answer - of course - is that you will see none.  Closeups of brightly 
lit
objects will mean a very short exposure. This will be way too short to show
stars in the sky.

--------------------------------
The camera that took the questioned photo was mounted on the chest of the 
suit, where his hands are clearly placed to operate it.
The "evidence" is false.

The C isn't on the original negative.
https://www.iop.org/explore-physics/moon/how-do-we-know-we-went-to-the-moon
The "evidence" is false.

The flag wasn't fluttering, it was wrinkled from storage.
The "evidence" is false.

They did jump quite a bit higher on the Moon than they could on Earth in a 
suit that doubled their weight. Pick up someone your size and see how high 
you can jump, the only fair comparison.
The "evidence" is false.